![]() The JBEC and the ACC Board want members and breeders to be aware of legislation in other countries (most of Europe), and the possibility that, in the future, laws may be passed in the United States forbidding cropping, docking, and dewclaw removal. In no way does this article suggest that dogs be eliminated from our gene pool because they had rear dewclaws. Removing front dewclaws can impact health: Physically active dogs which have had the front dewclaws removed are prone to developing arthritis at the carpal joint, sometimes sufficiently severe and early to end a performance event or working career.Chesapeake Bay Retrievers: DQ for Dewclaws? The current situation in countries that have laws forbidding the removal of dewclaws (front and rear). All but one wild dog species (the African Wild Dog or Painted Wolf) have front dewclaws, including all those most closely related to domestic dogs. They are used for self-grooming and to help steady objects a dog may hold between its forepaws when lying down. Even though these toes don’t reach the ground when a dog is standing or trotting, they are functional, stabilizing the carpal (wrist) joint, especially when moving at speed or making sharp turns. The front dewclaws are equivalent to our thumbs. The breed standards allow it but there is compelling reason not to remove them. People remove front dewclaws for easier grooming or to make the front leg look smoother some feel it presents an unnecessary risk of injury to dogs working in rough terrain. They may be inherited and should be considered faulty but because they are integrated into the musculoskeletal structure of the rear leg they shouldn’t be removed without medical cause. There are reports of functioning rear dewclaws with skeletal and muscular attachment to the leg in Aussies, though these are rare. The Norwegian Lundehund breed has one or two functioning rear dewclaws. In rare instances, dogs may have functional rear dewclaws. In field conditions they may snag on things and tear. They are encased in flaps of skin that protrude from the leg and lack continuity with the remainder of the skeleton. Rear dewclaws, remnants of the first toe, are virtually always non-functional and should be removed in breeds where they aren’t required (including Aussies.) Rear dewclaws typically do not attach to the other bones in the rear legs. However, they obviously occur often enough – or at least did historically – for them to merit mention requiring removal in most breed standards.įront dewclaws are allowed to be removed per most breed standards, but shouldn’t be for functional reasons and there are many Northern European countries where it isn’t allowed at all. There are no statistics on rear dewclaws, but they don’t appear common. Whether they are “normal’ or not depends on the breed. Rear dewclaws are abnormal for members of the dog family in general (wolves, foxes, etc.), but do occur in domestic dogs. Sometimes a dog may have triple rear dewclaws. Double rear dewclaws are required in some breeds. They emerge along the side of the lower leg and do not touch the ground when the dog is in a normal stance. ![]() Dewclaws are fifth toes on either front or rear legs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |